Quality of technology effect on language education and economic
Ширин Абдулла Аль Манаи
Докладчик
аспирант
Санкт-Петербургский государственный аграрный университет
Санкт-Петербургский государственный аграрный университет
402(онлайн МсТимз)
2022-03-17
16:10 -
16:30
Ключевые слова, аннотация
Quality; Language learning; Data mining ; Teaching tools; ISBSG repository; Linguistic
problems and projects .
Тезисы
In this article, we will discuss the role of
quality in improving technology in the language learning sector and the
economic sector. In fact, there are so many exciting alternatives for utilizing
technology to solve linguistic problems
and projects that it may be daunting for language instructors today.
Because one of language instructors' main responsibilities is to assist
students understand how linguistic and cultural norms work, it's critical that
they examine how language is utilized in both old and new ways across various
mediums and technology[1].Thus, given the rapid evolution of technology and the
social interaction and learning opportunities it provides, teachers are
becoming more and more required to understand how to handle it effectively and
enjoy experimenting with new technology, with a wide range of resources, tools,
and Web sites best suited to a given lesson or activity[2]. So, good quality is
achieved when the language learning process meets the needs and expectations of
the teachers. One of the most important responsibilities of any educational
institution is to provide high-quality education, which may be improved by
enhancing decision-making procedures in various processes. Data mining from an
educational institution is one technique to improve the quality of procedures.
This can provide new knowledge in the decision-making process and in
identifying more enhanced policies for educational practices[10].
In addition, we can show the role of quality in
all aspects of life. For example, in the economic sector, there is an empirical
study that tested several theories about the relationship between software
quality (measured in defect density) and cost drivers (cost factors). The study
looks at three cost drivers: labor, project size (measured in functional
points), and the average number of tasks allocated to one team member. The
study used the ISBSG data repository[3]. The results show that project size and
labor have a significant negative impact on defect density. These results
suggest that these quality factors should be considered when allocating project
resources to reduce defects and, as a result, product maintenance costs[5][8].
On the other hand, an empirical study was conducted to investigate the
relationship between software project size and defects. The results show a weak
correlation between size and defects. However, for development projects, the
correlation is stronger. Moreover, in mature projects, the correlation becomes
very weak [4][9]. The most important methods or techniques for solving
optimization problems that contribute to production planning and optimum
decision-making, such as maximizing profits, reducing costs, or increasing
production capacity, are dynamic programming and a compromise set[6][7] .